Ticketing

Please note this guide is Eventbrite First-Come First-Served (FCFS)-centric, there are some theoretical aspects here worth taking note of. See Debatable.

Pre-registration

  • To gain quick idea of interest before actually releasing tickets.
  • Allows an idea on priority release for certain groups if needed.

Ticket Release

ASSUMPTION: FCFS ticket style only via Eventbrite. See Alternative Methods for some other alternative ticketing methods.

  • Release tickets about 6 weeks before the event.
  • Multiple small batches, this keeps up the hype.
    • Keep a rotation of ticket releases: E.g.: Monday 1pm, Tuesday 3pm, Wednesday 4pm, Thursday 7pm, Friday 8pm. This ensures the different segments are taken care of and people don't feel like they've been excluded.
    • Ticket releases are announced via the Mailing List - this ensures people sign up to the mailing list and increases the 'hook' for (potential) attendees to keep track of whats going on in the newsletter / Mailing List.
  • Ensure that only 1 ticket can be purchased, not multiple at once. Will be a nightmare for Registration if multiple purchases are allowed.

  • Below are some Custom Questions you might want to ask amongst others:

    • Any allergies, dietary requirements you need to be aware of?
    • Any special requirements? (Medical, Accessibility)
    • Are you Under-18? (This assumes you're allowing U-18s to participate)
    • Do you have access to EduRoam / {X University Network}
    • First-time hackathon attendee?

Access Codes

  • Usually meant to be for:
    • Beginners.
    • Individuals from groups under-represented in technology.
    • Those with special needs or requiring special accommodations.
    • For University-specific groups.
      • Keep an active eye out on universities with only 1 or 2 students attending. Ask them if they have friends who would like to come and provide enough tickets for them to form a team.

Waitlist

  • Give people on the waitlist 24 hours to respond.
  • 3 days before the event, it would be better to prioritise people local or close to your hackathon (low travel costs).
  • Consider giving a ticket to attendees on the waitlist who email / message asking for a ticket as they're more likely to come.

NOTE: Eventbrite has a weird bug where tickets released to waitlisted people are claimed but not taken off the waitlist.

Alternative Methods

  • Type of ticket releases

    • First-Come First-Served Ticketing

      Advantages:

      • Lowest barrier to entry of the 3 methods listed down. Applicants simply log-on to Eventbrite at the specified time, purchase (a free) ticket and done.
      • Immediate and people can make plans straightaway.
      • Using batch-based ticketing helps maintain the interest in the event.

        • Also allows word to spread to non-insider groups. However, this should be addressed during the initial batches to allow people traveling from afar to get cheap tickets.

        Disadvantages:

      • Can become a case of who has the fastest internet speed / can click the fastest.
      • Unfriendly to disabled users, especially because of how fast tickets can go in FCFS. Need to release tickets but without being seen to be 'targeting' them.
      • Effort required to cover all potential target audiences, i.e. rotating ticket releases.
    • Randomized Pool

      Advantages:

      • Completely randomized from a pool.
      • Usually for the university's own students.

        Disadvantages:

      • Completely randomized from a pool.
      • Needs to be done early to avoid attendees having to pay a high travel cost.
    • Applications

      Advantages:

      • For (softly) themed hackathons, if they're looking for people with experience in the field this will help narrow down to attendees with experience.
      • Helps successful applicants get jobs with companies.

        • Their CV's / emails are sent out to sponsoring companies.
        • Part of the recruitment clause in the sponsorship package.
        • Applicants should be aware of this fact (Ethical issue: Data Privacy).

        Disadvantages:

      • High barrier to entry.
        • Daunting to first-timers / beginners especially if they feel that they're disadvantaged for not having a CV / LinkedIn / GitHub.
        • Questionable as to why are these questions (GitHub handle / LinkedIn / CV) required? Organizers need to be upfront about what they are using this data for. Sponsorship, recruitment or?
        • Note that having such information is not a substitute for on-day interaction with hackers. But better than blanket recruitment emails where the click-in rate is low.
      • Especially for beginners or people without any programming experience, they will feel "they're not good enough"
      • Selection process is opaque and subject to (sub)conscious bias.
    • Programming Challenge

      Advantages:

      • Useful for themed hackathons or

        Disadvantages:

      • Similarly to Applications method, high barrier to entry.
        • Daunting to first-timers / beginners especially if they don't feel qualified.

Things worth Noting

  • Accessibility to various groups
    • Individuals from groups under-represented in technology.
    • Those with special needs or requiring special accommodations.

The On-Day Execution Segment can be found here

results matching ""

    No results matching ""